In the Programs Finance Committee’s third night of budget appeal hearings, extended discussion arose Thursday over the Oregon Daily Emerald and the Philosophy Club budgets.
The Emerald asked the PFC for approval of its original budget request of $132,870, but it left the meeting with $120,000, an increase from the $99,652 it was allocated at the first budget hearing Jan. 22.
The PFC gave the Emerald less than it requested because committee members think the newspaper is capable of raising more funds on its own. PFC members agreed with ASUO Controller Danielle Hathaway, who suggested that the Emerald do more fundraising instead of asking the PFC for funding.
But Emerald General Manager Judy Riedl said the newspaper already raises about $800,000 a year. Riedl and Emerald reporter Jeremy Lang said the newspaper has reduced its reliance on the student incidental fee, and the Emerald has not asked for a budget increase in the past five years.
“I am disappointed in the decision,” Emerald Editor in Chief Jack Clifford said. “But I cannot comment further until I have an opportunity to talk with the staff about our options.”
Clifford said the newspaper had a fair hearing because Emerald members were given the opportunity to express their concerns.
Lisa Blasch, co-chair of the Philosophy Club, left the PFC meeting feeling the club had not received a fair budget reconsideration. The PFC decreased the Philosophy Club’s budget by $701.
Blasch said she didn’t feel the PFC was interested in supporting student groups that want to pursue new opportunities.
Neither the Emerald nor the Philosophy Club was willing to comment as to whether they plan to appeal the PFC’s decisions. Student groups can appeal PFC budget decisions three times.