On Thursday, the World Bank discussed whether to fund the proposed Nam Theun 2 Dam in Laos. As American students studying development in Northeast Thailand, we have seen first hand the devastation hydroelectric power dams have on local villagers. These villagers have depended on the natural cycles of the Mun River for generations. The Pak Mun Dam is a well known example of a failed development project, and the World Commission on Dams has acknowledged it as such. The Nam Theun 2 Dam promises similar consequences to an even larger degree. Pak Mun Dam failed under a relatively stable Thai government, while the strict Communist Lao regime doesn’t allow villagers to protest or voice their dissent.
In a cost-benefit analysis, the 25 year lifespan of this dam will in no way offset the permanent loss of sustainable livelihoods, natural ecosystems and endangered species unique to the area that would be destroyed if the project passes. Ninety percent of the electricity to be generated from Nam Theun 2 Dam will go to Thailand, which ironically has cheaper, renewable energy alternatives. The World Bank’s mission statement is to lift people out of poverty. This cannot be accomplished through the destruction of the natural resources that citizens depend on for their livelihood. This project is unnecessary and destructive. It does not fulfill the World Bank’s criteria for decision-making.
We have the potential to harness real sustainable energy. It is time to put away the notion that hydroelectricity is a harmless and sustainable option. There is too much at stake to remain idle. As citizens of a connected world, we all have a duty to stand up for the oppressed Laotian villagers and demand that the World Bank learn from its past mistakes and deny funding for this devastating project.

The Council on International
Educational Exchange Students are currently participating in a study abroad program in Khon Kaen, Thailand