Response to Dreier just knee-jerk liberalism
Attacks on ASUO candidate Tim Dreier in Tuesday’s Emerald were unfounded (“Dreier creates racist environment,” “Dreier seeks leadership through fear,” ODE 2/19). Yanagishita’s and Edwards’ letters both represent the fanatical knee-jerk liberalism that is bringing not just this school but this country down.
First, to respond to Yanagishita’s claim that Dreier is creating a hostile and racist environment. The red threat is found on every continent. It is not limited to one country of origin or one culture. From the Tupac Amaru Revolutionaries of Uruguay to the Red Brigade of Europe to Earth First and the ELF here on our home soil, this threat is pervasive, regardless of race or creed. How difficult the task ahead is, with our inability to type the subversives along any of these lines.
Edwards, you question how to define a subversive, and wonder about the complex term “un-American.” Well, let me clear things up for you. “Un-American” defines anyone or thing that stands against freedom and the American way of life. A subversive is anyone who wants to undermine these values to fit their own twisted agenda. Edwards, I only hope that you have the sense to see through your liberal rhetoric and recognize the importance of the task at hand. Bravo, Mr. Dreier, and see you at the polls.

Kimberly Froemming

Eugene

Drier considered sophomoric
My congratulations to ASUO presidential candidate Timothy Dreier. He exemplifies “sophomoric” more exactly than anyone I have ever met.

Henry G. Campbell, Jr.

community education student

Edwards is a

commie sympathizer
The letter by Nathan Edwards in Tuesday’s Emerald clearly demonstrates his complete lack of understanding in regard to my platform (“Dreier seeks leadership through fear,” ODE, 02/19).
His major is listed as English. This would lead one to believe that Edwards would have some understanding of what we call “satire.” Apparently, this is a poor assumption to make. So, for Edwards and any others who don’t quite understand, I will offer a little pocket synopsis.
Every candidate is running on a set of buzz-words and vague ideas that encourage conformity — I am just running on a different set. If you read the statements by other candidates, you will find just as many vague references and bits of paranoia, only theirs will be things lcike “diversity,” “safety” and “student voice.” You will not see a clarification of what any of these things mean or how any of their plans will come to fruition. Hence, I am running on a McCarthyism platform to demonstrate absurdity by going to the opposite extreme.
While Jonathan Swift is busy eating Irish babies, I will be busy eliminating subversives with dueling pistols. And, as far as Edwards’ vote goes, I don’t need support from an obvious communist sympathizer.

Timothy Dreier

sophomore

economics
 

Fashion show

a spectacular success
With the help of various departments and student groups, local Eugene and Springfield stores and shops, talented performers and all of our Black Heritage models, the ninth annual AKA Black Heritage Fashion Show was a spectacular success.
Thank you to everybody who helped to make the show what it was, and to the 300 people that came out to see it. A special shout-out to Melissa Ballard, the star of the show, who had the crowd laughing out of their seats.
Lastly, I would like to say “skee-weee” to those lovely women of the Sigma Delta Chapter of Alpha Kappa Alpha who worked diligently to produce an outstanding show and who always strive to be “supreme in service to all mankind.”

Abolade “Bola” Majekobaje

senior

biology

Eugene needs housing code
Because I am only a freshman and living on campus, some might feel that the need for a housing code in Eugene would not affect me. However, I, like a majority of freshmen, will be a renter next year. The fact that Eugene does not have a housing code to provide for the rights of renters and landlords scares me.
A housing code is designed to keep our city neighborhoods in a safe, clean and livable environment.
By drafting a code, the city would help designate rules for upkeep of houses or apartment complexes and other basic maintenance issues, as well as help alleviate other potential problems.
The current code that Eugene operates under (the Oregon State Landlord and Tenant Act) doesn’t allow for these things to happen. In fact, the general guidelines it is based on were drafted with the intention that cities would create their own, more specific codes.
This is an important issue that affects all students, faculty and staff, and other renters in the city of Eugene. It should be taken seriously.

Morgan York

freshman

exercise and movement science
 

Bailey and Nisser:

the ticket with experience
Student elections are here again, and voting is so easy. All it takes is logging onto DuckWeb and a few mouse clicks. But that really isn’t all there is to it. Voting is important, and informed choices are always the best. With so many candidates running, that decision is harder
to make.
This year, however, one ticket really stands out: Eric Bailey and Charlotte Nisser. They have more experience both inside the ASUO and outside in the greater campus than any other ticket running. Bailey is currently in his second year as an ASUO senator, where he has been the ombudsman and senate vice president. Additionally, he remains extremely active in the residence halls, where he has been a programs assistant and is currently the Residence Hall Association president.
Nisser served on the ASUO Elections Board and was an intern for ASUO President Wylie Chen. She is very active at KWVA, where she has been the news director and now serves as the radio station’s general manager.
A vote this year is very important. Make yours count with a vote for true and diversified experience. Vote Bailey and Nisser for
ASUO Executive.

Erica Legleiter

senior

comparative literature
 

Here’s a helpful voting tip
You might be a bit confused as to who you should vote for in the ASUO Executive elections. I’ll make it easy on you. Vote for Rachel Pilliod and Ben Buzbee, and our school will be a better place
next year.
There are many qualified candidates running this year, but Rachel and Ben are not only the team that is the most qualified to get the job done, but they also have the vision and track record to back it up.
Being experienced within the workings of the ASUO is an essential ingredient in the brewing of effective leaders that will make the University a better place to go to school. Ben has been on Student Senate for a year, and he has been a member of the EMU Board for two years. That experience, combined with Rachel being an intern last year, and a member of the current ASUO Executive staff this year, makes for a dynamic duo that will be able to take the ball and run
with it.
Not only is their platform filled with realistic and attainable goals, but Rachel and Ben know what it takes to accomplish these goals. Being one of Ben’s best fr
iends and seeing all the work Rachel has done as the ASUO Health and Wellness Coordinator, I am confident they will use their leadership qualities to better our campus. Vote for Rachel and Ben for
ASUO Executive!

Justin F. Zuiker

junior

business administration

Ritchie and Babkes

can make campus safe
Sean Ritchie and Jason Babkes are the best candidates for the ASUO Executive position, for several reasons.
One issue they champion is nighttime campus safety. Before the recent incidences occurred on campus, Sean and Jason had nighttime campus safety as an instrumental part of their platform.
Since the recent breaches in safety on campus, Ritchie and Babkes have generated a few effective and proactive ideas for keeping the University community safe. Such ideas include a proctored route by which students could walk/bike from one side of campus to another, brighter lighting, cutting back overgrown bushes along pathways, golf cart taxis and bike taxis. These ideas are inexpensive and can be easily implemented.
Sean Ritchie and Jason Babkes are dedicated to the safety of our University community. Support safety and pro-active solutions. Vote Ritchie and Babkes!

Molly Rogers

senior

international studies and sociology

Election offers

rare opportunity
It is that time of year again — people in brightly colored shirts handing out fliers; the kiosk is unrecognizable … ah yes, it is time for the ASUO Student Elections. While the many candidates and their entourages passing out fliers might annoy you, there are also as many students who do not even have a clue as to what is going on. Those of you who have a clue are probably asking yourself why you should even vote. That is a really great question, and we have an answer: because you can. Voting is the easiest way to get your voice heard.
You pay more than $500 a year in incidental fees and the ASUO allocates this out to the student unions. The Athletic Department Finance Committee, which is composed of students you elect, negotiates with the Athletic Department to maintain student tickets. Choosing the right candidates for these positions could make the difference between students losing 500 seats or not.
The Exec has the potential to do great things and they also have the potential to do nothing. If you have been disillusioned thus far by the ASUO, then figure out which Exec ticket has a platform that appeals to you and vote for them. With 10 Exec tickets, at least one of them should appeal to you on some level. This is a rare opportunity and we encourage you to utilize
it wisely.

Courtney Hight

ASUO Elections Coordinator

Mannix and Willett

can make changes
For those of you who actually care about the ASUO elections, read on (if not, go look at the Track Town ads or something).
Vote for Ezra Mannix and Lucas Willett. They are the only candidates I’ve heard yet who actually respond to some questions with ideas that are both concrete and attainable. Contrast this with most of the other candidates, who pretty much stick to fuzzy generalities and pie-in-the-sky ideas like “lower tuition.”
Mannix’s and Willett’s suggestions, if implemented, would actually bring small, but measurable and positive changes to this campus, that, with some committed student lobbying, could actually
be done.
Vote for them.

Don Titus

senior

architecture