Participants of Tuesday night’s teach-in should be commended for their efforts to further educate the community about the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and contemplate the pros and cons of retaliation. In an overwhelming act of support for the event, more than a thousand people crowded into the EMU Ballroom and then spilled out into the Maple Room, the Oak Room and the second floor lobby.
The enormity and eagerness of the crowd shows how dedicated this community is to understanding and supporting the exploration of complex issues facing all Americans. The dialogue was balanced with opposing views on military action from University professors and organization members. Praise should be given to audience members who responded to the views peacefully and respectfully. A discussion of events of this magnitude warrants contrary points of view to be effective. The discussion was not simply an anti-war rally, but an introductory education in global politics and an exploration of alternatives to an American military response to the terrorist attacks on the East Coast.
The Concerned Faculty for Peace and Justice, which is composed of about 70 faculty members, did an excellent job of sponsoring and promoting the event. As the situation between the United States and Afghanistan progresses, more panel discussions should be encouraged, as they are obviously supported by the University community.
The teach-in accomplished what a university setting should provide for the community. The thoughtful discussion fostered an environment where divergent ideas could be presented without judgment.
Some of these ideas were reminiscent of two female lawmakers who voted against entering into war in two different eras. Jeanette Rankin was a representative from Montana and the lone member of Congress to vote against the United States’ entry into both World Wars. In Rankin’s footsteps, Barbara Lee, a democrat from California, voted Sept. 14 against House Resolution 64, which endorsed military action in retaliation to the terrorist attacks three days prior.
Whether you agree with their stance or not, these two women showed courage of conviction, which was also prevalent in many of the ideas expressed during the teach-in. More people should show such courage in the uncertain days and weeks to come. We thank the faculty group for starting the conversation.