In the past two weeks, the Emerald has received considerable feedback about our editorial concerning KUGN-AM calling itself “the voice of the Ducks,” while broadcasting syndicated talk shows by hosts that engage in speech that is harmful to specific populations in the community. After reading much of the feedback, it seems that a clarification is in order.
Our editorial did not call for censorship, as we don’t believe Savage’s and Medved’s shows should be forced off the air. This is not a case of a government agency withholding funds from an organization because it disagrees with the organization’s politics. It’s a different matter when a government agency accepts money from an organization and allows that organization to represent it in public — when the organization’s behavior violates the agency’s stated principles.
By disassociating with KUGN, the University would not be withholding money in an attempt to censor, it would be upholding its mission.
Related News Stories:
Eugene groups respond to KUGN
Frohnmayer responds to KUGN debate
Community quietly talks about KUGN
KUGN talk show content angers students
Related Opinion Stories:
‘Adversarial’ radio hosts draw critics, supporters
KUGN (Illustration 12/04/02)
UO ignores students’ KUGN concerns
Clarifying our stance on KUGN
UO must ask if KUGN ‘enhances’ image
Money pressures cause Frohnmayer’s KUGN stance to be transparent
UO should not censor embattled KUGN shows
Related Letters:
Letters to the editor (12/02/02)
Letters to the editor (11/20/02)
Letters to the editor (11/18/02)
Letters to the editor (11/14/02)
Related Websites:
KUGN: The voice of the Ducks
MichaelSavage.com
MichaelMedved.com