Christine Kearney, an associate professor of political science, will be one of the speakers at today’s “After September 11” teach-in, sponsored by the political science department and ASUO. Kearney spoke to the Emerald in a Q & A session about her presentation, “The Clash of Civilizations?” regarding the incidents of September 11 and the American response. Her words have been edited for brevity and clarity.
Q. What role does religion have in the conflict of civilizations?
More often than not, religious differences are a rallying point of conflicts, but the underlying causes may actually be different. Religion is very important, but we should not put too much weight on religious conflicts. I think a lot of these sources of conflict are part of broader issues, like political ideology or power struggles. Sometimes people have conflicts with governments that are not legitimate. However, using religious symbols can be a very powerful way to rally people.
We have concentrated on Osama bin Laden. Are his aims a clash of civilizations using religion? I think to some extent they have to do with religion, like the United States stationing troops in the Holy Land. But, I wonder if some of it has to do with his disagreements with the government of Saudi Arabia and his own personal aspirations for power.
Q. Is globalism a cause for conflict?
Globalism is funny. On the one hand, people who fight aspects of globalism can use it to their advantage. The Internet, moving money quickly and global media are all products of globalism, and using them has helped many transnational movements. But I think there are a lot of developing countries that reject some of the cultural values of globalism. Consumerism can be a source of dissatisfaction. Even this is unclear, though. People do seem to want to buy televisions and cars. If that is because of advertising or values, it is unclear.
Q. Is there a conflict against the United States ?
The United States is sort of a lightning rod. I think there are some people who resent what they call “the hypocrisy of the United States,” which says it supports a better life for everyone, whereas in practice, the United States fights against these values because of these short-term security goals. Now, I am not saying the United States was pursuing policies that they felt were correct, but these policies have consequences, and they may not always be popular.